NO SURPRISE
Sadly, I am not surprised at Obama's silence concerning the number of police murders and racially motivated murders of white people in the past few months. I was also not surprised at his quick criticism and attacks against innocent white people and law enforcement when black people were killed during the commission of crimes. He has been a one man wrecking crew concerning race relations and law and order in America. I have not been surprised because i paid attention to his admitted history, philosophy, associates and dreams, as well as his stated goals, which he confirmed with his unholy alliances with enemies of the United States, and his betrayal of long standing American interests and American allies. It is all part of a revolutionary pattern and worldview. Still, people laud and applaud the king for his impressive wardrobe.
I have read articles that say Christians should not criticize the President and i have had people become angry with my statements concerning Obama. However, my assessments are not based on personal and unsubstantiated views. The reason my comments are so negative is because they reflect his actual actions and policies, which are inherently repugnant to historical American ideals and Christian principles. But Obama and his destructive agenda are embraced by a society that has come to hate America's past and denounce American exceptionalism in favor of socialism and anti Christian government.
A POSSIBLE SCENARIO
If I wanted to take control of America, while giving the appearance that I was saving America, I would undermine local law enforcement, making them expendable, I would outlaw personal rights to protect self and family, I would fan the flames of social, economic, and racial upheaval, then I would step in, like a savior, and activate federal law enforcement (which would be totally under my control). Aren't you glad you can trust your government?
WHO WOULDA THUNK IT?
Bringing Islamic terrorist prisoners to our country is consistent with Obama's other anti-American actions. Most (if not all) Obama supporters are either complicit with his anti-American action or blind, and most (if not all) of Obama's political opponents are spineless, to let this atrocious action take place.
POLITICAL STRONGMAN
We are watching a political strongman wrest power from the States, into the hands of the Federal Government, therefore clinching a tighter fist of oppression on the people. This was fundamental issue in the War Between the States. Yes, the Confederacy had slavery, but then again, so did the Union. If there had been no money involved in slavery, the South would not have gone to war for slavery. It was MONEY, not racism that drove the slave trade in the North and the South. Racism is wrong, but remember, the love of money is the root of all evil.
A good outcome of the War Between the States was the abolishing of slavery. But it was also the beginning of the end of State's Rights. It took a system of megalomania, like the present Obama administration, to push against State's Rights to this extreme degree. This administration of Federal power (actually Presidential power to an unprecedented extent) has opened the door for more oppressive rule to take charge of our country, such as Socialism.
AS A SIDE NOTE, I ALSO DOUBT BUSH CREATED KATRINA
(this is not a justification for Bush failures, but a reminder of reality)
Here is some information I came across some time ago. I admit that I have not researched each part, however, I do remember that there was agreement on both sides of the aisle concerning the plausibility of Saddam Hussein having WND. Remember, S. H. had murdered possibly 200,000 of his own people, including the use of chemical warfare. He had his own people raped, tortured, imprisoned and murdered. In fact, the cache of chemical (and possibly biological) weapons were never fully recovered, even after his death. Hussein had used Scud missiles against Israel and was in the process of building the largest gun in history. He also referred to the Gulf War as the Mother of All Wars. Hussein was a monster, a liar, a tyrant. It was known that Hussein did have WMD but by the time UN monitors were able to get to the suspected locations, there were none there. AND DON'T FORGET (because I have not) that the weight of the US Government was behind action to stop this monster. People have waffled and pointed fingers, but at the time there was an agreement to insure safety.
Anyway, here is that document I mentioned. If you find errors, please let me know (with documentation). But remember, politicians change their stand more than they change their underwear, and knowing the sexual practices of some politicians, that would be a lot of changes.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
POLITICAL STRONGMAN
We are watching a political strongman wrest power from the States, into the hands of the Federal Government, therefore clinching a tighter fist of oppression on the people. This was fundamental issue in the War Between the States. Yes, the Confederacy had slavery, but then again, so did the Union. If there had been no money involved in slavery, the South would not have gone to war for slavery. It was MONEY, not racism that drove the slave trade in the North and the South. Racism is wrong, but remember, the love of money is the root of all evil.
A good outcome of the War Between the States was the abolishing of slavery. But it was also the beginning of the end of State's Rights. It took a system of megalomania, like the present Obama administration, to push against State's Rights to this extreme degree. This administration of Federal power (actually Presidential power to an unprecedented extent) has opened the door for more oppressive rule to take charge of our country, such as Socialism.
AS A SIDE NOTE, I ALSO DOUBT BUSH CREATED KATRINA
(this is not a justification for Bush failures, but a reminder of reality)
Here is some information I came across some time ago. I admit that I have not researched each part, however, I do remember that there was agreement on both sides of the aisle concerning the plausibility of Saddam Hussein having WND. Remember, S. H. had murdered possibly 200,000 of his own people, including the use of chemical warfare. He had his own people raped, tortured, imprisoned and murdered. In fact, the cache of chemical (and possibly biological) weapons were never fully recovered, even after his death. Hussein had used Scud missiles against Israel and was in the process of building the largest gun in history. He also referred to the Gulf War as the Mother of All Wars. Hussein was a monster, a liar, a tyrant. It was known that Hussein did have WMD but by the time UN monitors were able to get to the suspected locations, there were none there. AND DON'T FORGET (because I have not) that the weight of the US Government was behind action to stop this monster. People have waffled and pointed fingers, but at the time there was an agreement to insure safety.
Anyway, here is that document I mentioned. If you find errors, please let me know (with documentation). But remember, politicians change their stand more than they change their underwear, and knowing the sexual practices of some politicians, that would be a lot of changes.
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.